Самая "правильная" ФМ

[Vasya]

Сообщение от Ice_Eagle

Flies good! May I ask,what do those 2 values mean? Thanks.

These parameters characterize the flow of the wing.
The thin wing should have little difference between these parameters.

[Ice_Eagle]

Сообщение от Vasya

These parameters characterize the flow of the wing.
The thin wing should have little difference between these parameters.

Ok thanks, so how did you come up with those values?

[Vasya]

Сообщение от Ice_Eagle

Ok thanks, so how did you come up with those values?

Through many tests over several years.

[Ice_Eagle]

Сообщение от Vasya

Through many tests over several years.

So that's a 'universal' setting then. What about laminar flow? Because just because there are big radiators hanging from the wing, engine nacelle, etc., doesn't necessarily mean big drag numbers.

[Vasya]

Сообщение от Ice_Eagle

So that's a 'universal' setting then. What about laminar flow? Because just because there are big radiators hanging from the wing, engine nacelle, etc., doesn't necessarily mean big drag numbers.

For each plane I calculate my parameter.
I rely on the power of the engine, also look closely at the drawings - profile, wing narrowing, thickness and other parameters.
Setting up tx for each individual aircraft requires some calculations and several tests.
If there are polars of the original, then tx comes out of the first test.
The speed difference is 1-3 km.
Mig-3 flew with his TTX from the first time.
For other models it is necessary to correct different figures in fm.
This is to bring the behavior of the virtual plane closer to the original.
-------------------------------------------
This is my hobby in life.
Someone is fishing or climbing high mountains, and I like to set up virtual planes.